Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While we still need to nail down the final bits of namespace stuff, > I'm running into the need for it in IMCC code, so its time to finally > deal with it.
> I don't really care what the syntax looks like, so I'm proposing: > .namespace [foo; bar; baz] Done a bit: .namespace [ "Foo" ] .namespace [ "Foo"; "Bar" ] the latter is only in the parser currently (no deepere nesting yet). Do we want bare words too? leo
