Dan Sugalski wrote: > > If we're going to tackle this, though, we need to pull in some folks > who're actually competent at it before we do more than handwave about > the design.
A Language-Based Approach to Security (2000) http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/schneider00languagebased.html Linux Security Modules: General Security Support for the Linux Kernel (2002) http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/wright02linux.html The Three Security Architectures http://www.canonical.org/%7Ekragen/3-sec-arch.html Capability Security Model http://www.erights.org/elib/capability/index.html http://www.erights.org/elib/capability/duals/myths.html Code Access Security in .Net http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/02/09/SecurityinNET/ Blogs of the primary CLR CAS developers http://blogs.gotdotnet.com/gregfee http://blogs.dotnetthis.com/Ivan/ Java vs. .NET Security, Parts 1 + 2 http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2003/11/26/javavsdotnet.html http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2003/12/10/javavsdotnet.html -- Garrett Goebel IS Development Specialist ScriptPro Direct: 913.403.5261 5828 Reeds Road Main: 913.384.1008 Mission, KS 66202 Fax: 913.384.2180 www.scriptpro.com garrett at scriptpro dot com
