On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 03:23:40PM -0700, chromatic wrote: > On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 15:19, stevan little wrote: > > > If 5.6.1 is the official minimum, then maybe this brings back up the -w > > vs. warnings issue? Since Ovid pointed out that 5.6 was the minimum for > > the warnings pragma, and 5.6.1 is your "official" minimum, it seems > > maybe the choice is back on the table. > > What's the point of changing it? If you're not using lexical warnings > in the test, it does the same thing.
Exactly. "use warnings;" only has an effect on the code in that foo.t file. Without -w you'll get no warnings from any other code (DBI.pm etc). > Change for change's sake is often counterproductive to your goal. Yeap. Tim.
