>>>>> "LT" == Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
LT> Uri Guttman wrote: >>>>>>> "SB" == Scott Bronson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: SB> Has anybody inquired to the GMP project as to the possibility >> of SB> relaxing that restriction? If GMP truly is the best bignum SB> implementation, I definitely think it's worth asking. LT> Not AFAIK. Please try. >> i still have my stillborn bignum (using bcd registers and efficient >> algorithms) implementation if anyone wants to pick it up. i have some >> working base code and the overall design. LT> The major problem is: we need bignum now^Wtomorrow^WRSN. The Pie-thon LT> benchmarks does use long (integer?) arithmetics: +, - *, //, % AFAIK. LT> We can always switch the internals, as long as we keep it consistent LT> at the surface. sorry about the timing. and dan and i discussed the ability to swap the lib later so that is how we should go with my lib. but it still needs work so if anyone wants to get into parrot this way, let me know. uri -- Uri Guttman ------ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------- http://www.stemsystems.com --Perl Consulting, Stem Development, Systems Architecture, Design and Coding- Search or Offer Perl Jobs ---------------------------- http://jobs.perl.org
