Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tracking the results in an object is a better choice than scraping from
> a print buffer. One of the frustrating issues with Perl's testing
> tools is the limited flexibility we have due to reading the output from
> STDOUT.
I like that aspect about TAP... it's simple, humans and machines can
read it easily, and there's no reason why it has to be langauge-specific. I
think the only thing that could make it better would be if TAP output was
parseable by YAML. :-)
> we should at least publish an EBNF grammar for the output.
Definately!
- Tyler
