On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Will Coleda wrote: > >> So, again, do we in parrot want to support the ability to dig into our >> callers register set and pull out a particular register since we have >> no way to say which register that is when we're using PIR? Even >> unique_reg just says 'the register doesn't change', not "it's PMC >> register 3" >> >> > When you take a reference to the register you specify (just by naming it - > with it's $P0 or it's .local name) which register it is that you want to > reference. (What I forgot before is there's a dynop at work here too...). So > nothing here needs to know, in the PIR itself, what actual register number > is being used. > > Jonathan > > I think basically the question remans; is there any way we could do without the :unique_reg? kjs
