On Tuesday 12 June 2001 11:06 pm, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > I. Make ranges work on Unicode code-points (if they don't already). > > Urrrr, yes, they do, if you by code-point ranges mean \x{...}-\x{...} > but in general I would like to discourage the use of ranges. What do > you think [a-\N{KATAKANA LETTER KI}] should mean? I think it should > mean a compile time error. People misuse ranges for classes. Ranges > also imply some collation, which is, as discussed, really bad. Yes, ranges are bad, but they're occasionally useful. -- Bryan C. Warnock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: More character matching bits Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: More character matching bits Damien Neil
- Re: More character matching bits Simon Cozens
- Re: More character matching bits Simon Cozens
- Re: More character matching bits Damien Neil
- Re: More character matching bits Simon Cozens
- Re: More character matching bits Simon Cozens
- Re: More character matching bits Buddha Buck
- Re: More character matching bits Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: More character matching bits Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: More character matching bits Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: More character matching bits Buddha Buck
- Re: More character matching bits Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: More character matching bits Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: More character matching bits Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: More character matching bits Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: More character matching bits Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: More character matching bits Bart Lateur
- Re: More character matching bits Dan Sugalski
- Re: More character matching bits Bart Lateur
- Re: More character matching bits Bryan C . Warnock