On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:43:06AM -0700, Damien Neil wrote: > The language lawyer in me insists that I point out that this is > inherently nonportable. That as may be, Perl 5 runs on nearly 80 platforms and uses this trick. Is that portable enough for you? Simon
- Using int32_t instead of IV for code Hong Zhang
- Re: Using int32_t instead of IV for code Dan Sugalski
- Re: Using int32_t instead of IV for code Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Using int32_t instead of IV for code Dan Sugalski
- Re: Using int32_t instead of IV for code Philip Kendall
- Re: Using int32_t instead of IV for code Simon Cozens
- Re: Using int32_t instead of IV for code Dan Sugalski
- Re: Using int32_t instead of IV for code Damien Neil
- Re: Using int32_t instead of IV for code Dan Sugalski
- Re: Using int32_t instead of IV for code Simon Cozens
- Re: Using int32_t instead of IV for code Andy Dougherty
- RE: Using int32_t instead of IV for code Hong Zhang
- Re: Using int32_t instead of IV for code Philip Kendall
- Re: Using int32_t instead of IV for code Andy Dougherty
- Re: Using int32_t instead of IV for code Dan Sugalski
- Re: Using int32_t instead of IV for code Buddha Buck
- Re: Using int32_t instead of IV for code Paul Johnson
- Re: Using int32_t instead of IV for code Dan Sugalski
- Re: Using int32_t instead of IV for code Philip Kendall
- RE: Using int32_t instead of IV for code Hong Zhang