At 8:05 PM +0200 8/21/02, Angel Faus wrote:
> >
>> Sure, I have no problem with it. At one
>> time someone suggested making a separate
>> list for Parrot compilers, so I took it as
>> a hint that maybe we were spamming.
>>
>
>I am all for the creation of a new list for stuff such as imcc, and perl6
>compilers. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]?)
>
>So people interested in parrot internals (the hard stuff: GC, JIT,..) don't
>need to listen our discussions about bugs on imcc, feature requests, etc..
>
>On the other hand people like me that cannot keep track of all that happens on
>perl6-internals, would have an easier way of focusing on areas were we can
>actually contribute something.
If there's no objection, I'll ask Ask or Robert to set this up.
Everyone's got until, say, Friday noon my time (GMT-500) to object.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
