On Sat, Aug 19, 2000 at 05:07:15AM +1000, Damian Conway wrote: > > > But why introduce a new keyword "lreturn"? What about something like > > > this? > > > > > > sub foo { > > > my $lvalue : lvalue; > > > ... > > > return $lvalue if want('LVALUE'); > > > } > > > > Error proneness? (Is that a word?) > > It is now :-) > > Besides, context can't always tell: > > bar ( foo ); > > Should foo return a copy or an alias? want() obviously needs an additional parameter: how deep to go back in the call stack. Which begs also for a way to find out how deep is the call stack. -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
- RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to return an l... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to re... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able t... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be ab... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should b... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines sho... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be ab... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be ab... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should b... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines sho... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines sho... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should b... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines sho... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to re... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able t... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be ab... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should b... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines sho... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines... Johan Vromans