[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz) writes: > So is that something we've agreed, that lvalue subs are *always* > scalars? That'd mean we can move on to the various implementation > details. :) I think scalars play a super-normal role already. E.g., hashes and arrays can hold only scalar values. The restriction to scalars may be a small one, especially when it makes the whole idea of lvalued subroutines feasible. Without the need for zillions of operator overloads, complex prototypes and so on. -- Johan
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be abl... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be abl... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to return a... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to ret... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be abl... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines shou... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be abl... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines shou... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines ... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines ... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines shou... Damian Conway