Johan Vromans writes: > I think scalars play a super-normal role already. E.g., hashes and > arrays can hold only scalar values. The restriction to scalars may be > a small one, especially when it makes the whole idea of lvalued > subroutines feasible. Without the need for zillions of operator > overloads, complex prototypes and so on. Restriction to scalars is a feature of the current implementation of lvalue subroutines. "This restriction may be lifted in future" is in the documentation. You should consult with the PDL folks who were the drivers for the current lvalue sub implementation before unilaterally coming to this conclusion. Nat
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be abl... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be abl... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to return a... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to ret... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be abl... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines shou... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be abl... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines shou... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines ... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines ... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines shou... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to ret... David L. Nicol