On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 04:26:56PM -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote: > I tend to agree with Tom's argument here. open() is kind of funny > anyways. Why couldn't it work like this, similar to FileHandle: > > $fh = open $filename; Testing for failure. It's a basic tenet that system calls can be tested for success and failure by their returned truth values. I believe we should keep this. system() is the warty exception. -- A bug in the code is worth two in the documentation.
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining p... Michael Stevens
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining p... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defini... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuatio... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctu... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining p... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defini... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defini... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defini... Tim Jenness
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defini... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defini... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defini... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defini... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defini... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defini... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defini... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defini... Tim Jenness
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defini... Tom Christiansen