Tom Christiansen writes: : >Not sure I agree with that. I think one point of confusion / perceived : >difference between filehandles, open(), and basically every other : >builtin is that all the others *return* what you want. : : Think of all the {file,dir}handle syscalls. They don't do that. : They autoviv an object. Yes, but then each of those has to be explained specially. People *expect* assignment to "autovivify", as it were. But open() et al are essentially a 3rd syntax for constructors, and that's about one syntax too many, give or take a few. Larry
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuatio... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctu... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctu... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctu... Tim Jenness
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctu... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctu... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctu... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctu... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctu... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctu... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctu... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctu... Tim Jenness
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctu... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctu... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctu... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctu... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctu... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctu... Tom Christiansen