> Yes, but then each of those has to be explained specially. People > *expect* assignment to "autovivify", as it were. But open() et al > are essentially a 3rd syntax for constructors, and that's about one > syntax too many, give or take a few. I agree with this. I think of open() a lot more like a new() than like a chop(), personally. -Nate
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuatio... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuatio... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuatio... Tim Jenness
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuatio... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuatio... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuatio... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuatio... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuatio... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuatio... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuatio... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuatio... Tim Jenness
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuatio... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuatio... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuatio... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuatio... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuatio... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuatio... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuatio... Nathan Wiger