Re: Different higher-order func notation? (was Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions)

[Bart Lateur]

On Sun, 06 Aug 2000 17:35:17 -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote:

>I
>think the concept's great, just that the notation is really hard to
>read, and doesn't necessarily scream "function" to me (especially since
>_ is from stat already).

I don't see why you can't simply use _. From the context, you clearly
see that it's not a filehandle. And if all filehandles will have a '$'
prefix anyway, the filehandle _ won't even exist any more.

-- 
        Bart.