Re: Different higher-order func notation? (was Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions)

[Damian Conway]

I concur with Mike. If we *have* to have a prefix (and I *still* prefer
a naked __, gumble, grumble, pout), then I'd certainly rather ^ that &.

What we *really* need are some more types of brackets:

        $range = �__� < �val� && �val� < �__�;

;-)

Damian