Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> Let's not move backwards and force people to work like machines. Instead,
> lets force machines to work like us.
Hear, Hear! I feel that this is worth a "me too".
Clayton
--
Clayton Scott
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... David Corbin
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... David Corbin
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - l... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Clayton Scott
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... John Porter
