On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 05:10:34PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > The ultimate target of a program's source code is the *programmer*. > Programmers, being people (well, more or less... :), work best with symbols > and rich context. Stripping contextual clues out of code does the > programmer a disservice. We're at the point where we don't have to cater to > the limitations of the computer hardware. That means we'll be better off if > we cater to the limitations (and strengths!) of people's wetware. > > Let's not move backwards and force people to work like machines. Instead, > lets force machines to work like us. Exactly! I would also like to remind everyone that, despite abandoning backwards compatibility with programs, we should by no means abandon backwards compatibility with Perl programmers. Removing the special symbols would be quite a shock to most Perl programmers (including me), and we don't want to alienate those who know Perl. I say these things for purely selfish reasons; I like Perl, and want it to look much the same as it does now. Perl is a wonderful language. Michael -- Administrator www.shoebox.net Programmer, System Administrator www.gallanttech.com --
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... David Corbin
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... David Corbin
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - l... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Clayton Scott
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Damien Neil