>It only takes a few pages, and a few truth tables to explain NULL. >It should only take a few pages and a few examples, to explain the >difference between undef and null. Ah, so the cost of this is twice a few pages of explanation, plus truth tables and examples? Are you mad? I can think of no better proof that this is the Wrong Thing than your very own words. Thank you. ---tom
- Re: RFC 263 (v1) Add null() keyword and fundamental da... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 263 (v1) Add null() keyword and fundament... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 263 (v1) Add null() keyword and funda... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 263 (v1) Add null() keyword and funda... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 263 (v1) Add null() keyword and f... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 263 (v1) Add null() keyword a... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 263 (v1) Add null() keyw... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 263 (v1) Add null() ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 263 (v1) Add null() ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 263 (v1) Add null() ... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 263 (v1) Add null() ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 263 (v1) Add null() ... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 263 (v1) Add null() ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 263 (v1) Add null() ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 263 (v1) Add null() ... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 263 (v1) Add null() ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 263 (v1) Add null() keyword a... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 263 (v1) Add null() keyw... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 263 (v1) Add null() ... iain truskett
- Re: RFC 263 (v1) Add null() ... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 263 (v1) Add null() ... Russ Allbery