>It only takes a few pages, and a few truth tables to explain NULL.
>It should only take a few pages and a few examples, to explain the
>difference between undef and null.

Ah, so the cost of this is twice a few pages of explanation, plus truth 
tables and examples?  Are you mad?

I can think of no better proof that this is the Wrong Thing than 
your very own words.  Thank you.

---tom

Reply via email to