Adam Turoff wrote:
>
> That's a stone's throw awaty from:
>
> import english
> from english import filetest
>
> result = filetest.readable("/dev/null")
>
> I think the common prefix idea is a nonstarter. There must be a way
> to coming up with sensible names for all of -X that don't conflict
> with the core library.
I think perhaps that Uri was suggesting more a common letter prefix,
such as:
freadable($file);
fwritable($file);
fexecutable($file);
Than a piece of bastardized Pythonesque syntax. ;-)
-Nate
- Re: RFC 290 (v1) Remove -X Nathan Wiger
- RE: RFC 290 (v1) Remove -X Greg Boug
- Re: RFC 290 (v1) Remove -X Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 290 (v1) Remove -X Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 290 (v1) Remove -X Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 290 (v1) Remove -X Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 290 (v1) Remove -X Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 290 (v1) Remove -X Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 290 (v1) Remove -X Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 290 (v1) Remove -X Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 290 (v1) Remove -X Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 290 (v1) Remove -X John L. Allen
- Re: RFC 290 (v1) Remove -X Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 290 (v1) Remove -X Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 290 (v1) Remove -X Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 290 (v1) Remove -X Alan Gutierrez
- Re: RFC 290 (v1) Remove -X Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 290 (v1) Remove -X Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 290 (v1) Remove -X Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 290 (v1) Remove -X Dave Storrs
- Re: RFC 290 (v1) Remove -X Clayton Scott
