Peter Scott wrote: > > 'rewrite' is not the same as 'design', fortunately. I fervently hope that > the language design will be the product only of ideas Larry either came up > with or agreed with; if we get into some voting scenario, that spells > doom. May I point out that COBOL was designed by a committee. May I point out that "the camel was designed by committee"*, too? Really, I'd like to see this Designed By Committee Considered Harmful myth put to rest. *according to one famous epigram. -- John Porter By pressing down a special key It plays a little melody
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for docume... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for do... Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentation i... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentat... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for docume... Nicholas Clark
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for do... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML fo... Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for docume... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for do... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for do... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for do... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML fo... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use X... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use X... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use X... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentat... Adam Turoff