On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, John Porter wrote: > Peter Scott wrote: > > the idea is to be an extension of Larry's creative thinking > > process. Neither of us is deciding what goes into Perl 6, and neither is > > the community - I hope. Larry is. > > Uh, then why did Larry say "perl 5 was my rewrite, perl 6 is the > community's rewrite"? Clearly he does not think of himself as the > community. He has said it: this is *our* rewrite. Perl 6 is going to be the community's rewrite. His design to start, but the community's rewrite. (The alternative is to have the thing be *my* rewrite, and I don't think we want that... :) Dan
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentation i... Robin Berjon
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentation i... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentat... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for docume... Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for do... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML fo... Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentat... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for docume... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for do... Nicholas Clark
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML fo... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use X... Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for do... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML fo... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML fo... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML fo... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use X... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should u... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should u... John Porter