At 04:38 PM 2/15/2001 -0300, Branden wrote:
>Yeah. Beginners. I was one too. And I remember always falling on these...
>But that's OK, since we probably don't want any new Perl programmers...
I've skipped pretty much all this thread so far, but I do need to point out
that perl isn't targeted at beginning programmers, or beginning perl
programmers. It's targeted at experienced programmers. If you learn a
language you're a beginner once, and for a little while, but you end up
experienced for a much longer time.
Perl has lots of stuff that'll trip up beginners. That's OK. People are
clever, and they can learn.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Closures and default lexical-scope for subs Branden
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs Michael G Schwern
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs John Porter
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs Branden
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs John Porter
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs Branden
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for su... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for su... John Porter
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs Peter Scott
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs Edward Peschko
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs David Grove
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs Nathan Wiger
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs Branden
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for su... John Porter
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for su... Peter Scott
