Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs

[John Porter]

Branden wrote:
> 
> > If you had this 'use scope' pragma, this auto-error checking would be
> > compromised severely.
> 
> Actually, I think sometimes it can be done with -w (``Variable xyz used only
> once, probably spelling error'').

Except that only applies to un-declared variables, which currently
(and hopefully forever) can only be global variables.

-- 
John Porter