Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs

[abigail]

On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 11:08:47AM -0800, Edward Peschko wrote:
> 
> However, that still doesn't get rid of the gotchas - personally I think that:
> 
> my $a, $b, $c;
> 
> should be an error, a warning, or DWIM. Especially: 

Personally, I don't think so. 

    GetOptions (foo  =>  \my $foo,
                bar  =>  \my $bar);

and

    tie my $shoe => $tring;

are just way to practical to suddenly require more hoops.



Abigail