Damian Conway wrote [and John Porter reformats]:
>
> @bar[$foo]; # Access element int($foo) of array @bar
> %bar{$foo}; # Access entry "$foo" of hash %bar
> @bar{$foo}; # Syntax error
> %bar[$foo]; # Syntax error
And why is that superior to:
@bar[$foo]; # Access element int($foo) of array @bar
%bar{$foo}; # Syntax error
@bar{$foo}; # Syntax error
%bar[$foo]; # Access entry "$foo" of hash %bar
???
--
John Porter
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Damian Conway
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Michael G Schwern
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Me
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Me
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Buddha Buck
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Damian Conway
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Me
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation David L. Nicol
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Bart Lateur
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter
