Graham Barr said: > I am not interested in continuing this in private. As you wish. > If you don't want your comments public then be quite. I thought it was best for the list if we had some private exchanges first to reduce noise. I'll try to remember that you don't like that approach. > survey ? I never saw any survey, It was an informal finger-in-the-wind thing I sent to a perl beginners list. Nothing special, just a quick survey. http://www.self-reference.com/cgi-bin/perl6plurals.pl > I certainly do not see that many people on the > list agreeing with you. And that means I should be quiet? I hope not.
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Me
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Buddha Buck
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Damian Conway
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Me
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation David L. Nicol
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Bart Lateur
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Edward Peschko
- RE: what I meant about hungarian notation David Whipp
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Simon Cozens
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter