On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, at 03:07 PM, Damian Conway wrote:
In creating my operator list I deliberated shied away from the unary and binary
multimorphic forms. But I do see Graham's point and would favour retaining
polymorphic unary C<^> at least.
Meaning that the list:
+ - force to numeric context - - force to numeric context, negate +^ - force to numeric context, complement ~ - force to string context ~^ - force to string context, complement simply becomes: ^ - complement (type-specific) + - force to numeric context - - force to numeric context, negate ~ - force to string context Correct? MikeL
