On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:31:24 -0800, Michael Lazzaro wrote:
> Meaning that the list:
>
> +^ - force to numeric context, complement
> ~^ - force to string context, complement
>
> simply becomes:
>
> ^ - complement (type-specific)
Does this include booleans? I really liked the idea that not and xor were
just the same operator, but unary/binary. Otherwise, we have ! for boolean
negation only, while ^ does the same thing for other types, as well as xor
for everything. I don't mind leaving ! in as a synonym.
--
Peter Haworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Send this via the BT scuz-a-filtron"
-- Andy Wardley
