On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Graham Barr wrote: : On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 12:16:34PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : > A pair of backticks could be used if the vector-equals distinction is : > required: : > : > @a `+`= @b; : > @a `+=` @b; : : Thats ugly, IMO. : : Now this is going to sound wild (probably) and I have not thought too much : about it and there are probably others who can see the pitfalls quicker : then me. But could () be available for hyper operators ?
It would work for binary ops, but unfortunately, nothing that looks like a term can work for unary ops. (Also parens are already used as a postfix operator that means call the preceding function ref.) Larry
