> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Murat_=DCnalan?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 10:21:11 +0100 > > > to provide a feeling for the weight of opinion, e.g., "most > > people felt this way", "some people felt differently", etc. > > One should trace back who was of what opinion. So my suggestion would be > > Discussion: "Foo feature" > "Want it": Person A, Person B, Person C, Person D > "Reject it: Person E, Person F, Person G, Person H > "Neutral": Person I
I don't think we would really need a "Neutral" list... > So posters should also may try to give a "clean" statement on there > final posts > how they feal about the feature. So, would this precise list really help the design team in making decisions. As I see it, they don't care how many of us like a particular feature; on the contrary, they're using us as idea machines. If one person comes up with an idea they like, and most people hate it, they might still use it. I think the original "general consensus" is fine, and a more specific list would only bog down the summaries. > Like > > I think that, but this is.... > Vote: "reject this feature". Vote: "reject this idea" :) Luke
