On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Buddha Buck wrote: > You suggest doing it in HTML. Wouldn't it make more sense to do it in > POD, the standard documentation language for Perl?
For now, since it's a web site, let's stick to HTML. If somebody just way prefers POD, contact me off list and we'll figure out the best way to proceed. > And how do these differ in concept to the RFC process Perl 6 has already > gone through? Wouldn't it make sense, assuming that clean, final > presentations of proposed ideas or features in Perl are useful, to > re-open the RFC process? RFC's are proposals before the comments. The summaries are, well, summaries of the comments. My main concern is that Larry, Damian, et al, are likely to have a hard time reading through all the comments in the language list (Damian isn't even in the list right now), so the summaries are a way of letting them cut to the chase on the discussion of each idea. -miko Miko O'Sullivan Programmer Analyst Rescue Mission of Roanoke
