On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Chris Marshall <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> The above is an unsubstantiated ... > >> > >> I see it differently. It shows that at least one user finds PDL slow > >> and hard to use compared to other products... > >> > >> I think I recall hearing that at one point the CPAN install actually > >> depended on OpenGL.... > > > > ... I compiled PDL and use it without any X on my machine... > > Thanks for the link, Leandro. I've posted a reply at > http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=891888 if anyone is > interested. > > While it is disappointing to hear negative statements > about PDL (especially vague, undocumented ones :-), I > think it points to exactly the problem that we have > in growing the PDL community. > Thanks for taking the time to reply and setting things straight, I sent it to you because I don't like when stuff like that sits there on the web uncorrected because then unfortunately it eventually becomes true even though it is clearly false and like you said totally lacking supporting evidence. I have also had to write quite a few times over the years too setting things straight with people when I see bashing incorrect posts about Perl in general or other Perl aspects.
_______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
