I would like to see a physics and PDL book I think that would be the greatest 
thing !!!

with code of the simulation in each of these category's 

BASIC FORMULAS 
STATISTICS 
NOMOGRAMS 
PHYSICAL CONSTANTS 
CLASSICAL MECHANICS 
SPECIAL RELATIVITY 
GENERAL RELATIVITY 
HYDRODYNAMICS 
AERODYNAMICS 
THERMODYNAMICS 
STATISTICAL MECHANICS 
KENETIC THEORY 
VISCOSITY 
THERMAL CONDUCTION 
DIFFUSION 
ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY 
ELECTRONICS 
SOUND & ACOUSTICS 
OPTICS 
ATOMIC SPECTRA 
MOLECULAR SPECTRA 
QUANTUM MECHANICS 
NUCLEAR THEORY 
COSMIC RAYS 
HIGH-ENERGY PHYSICS 
PARTICAL ACCELERATORS 
SOLID STATE DEVICES 
THEORY OF MAGNETISM 
CHEMISTRY 
ASTROPHYSICS 
CELESTRIAL MECHANICS 
METEOROLOGY 
BIOPHYSICS 

may be a good way to learn physics too ...


________________________________
From: chm <[email protected]>
To: Joel Berger <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Perldl] PDL book live for 2.4.10?

On 10/17/2011 4:20 PM, Joel Berger wrote:
> You might talk to chromatic about POD book creation, or look at his
> repo for Modern Perl, which is written in POD with POD::Weaver at
> https://github.com/chromatic/modern_perl_book


An interesting idea but I would prefer to see more
effort on content.  The advantage of POD as a base
format is everyone is familiar and it has the advantage
of tying in directly with the PDL documentation tools.
But, I didn't really understand enough of what I read
in the POD::Weaver description to say whether or not
my impression is reasonable.  (On the other hand,
if it is not easily apprehensible, that may be making
my point...)

Cheers,
Chris


> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Matthew Kenworthy
> <[email protected]>  wrote:
>> Hi Chris, Karl, and other PDL Book interested people:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Chris Marshall<[email protected]>  
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Matt-
>>>
>>> How are things going with the PDL book "project"
>>> as far as status, plans, working files, or other
>>> information?  Would setting up a git folder at
>>> sf.net help with coordination and contributions?
>>
>> A git folder would be a good idea :)
>>
>> Here were my thoughts on PDL Books and Tutorials -
>>
>> In order to write and edit PDL documentation, it would be good to have
>> a simple format that everyone could edit easily and see it updated in
>> a timely fashion, but that it could be exported to something nicer as
>> a printable format in a PDF, such as the LaTeX output of the original
>> PDL Book.
>>
>> To this end, I decided to try rewriting the PDL Book in POD.
>>
>> I've found out that this works surprisingly well, because:
>>
>> 1) Writing in POD means that it is completely available and searchable
>> in the PDL help system
>>
>> 2) There's no maintaining a separate documentation repository (it
>> lives with PDL)
>>
>> 3) It can be cross-linked in with the PDL core documentation
>>
>> To test this out, I converted the PDL Book Chapter 3, which is image
>> intensive chapters in the book, in order to see what the output would
>> be like in HTML and PDF.
>>
>> The original POD documentation:
>>
>> http://www.strw.leidenuniv.nl/~kenworthy/pdlpod/PDL.Tut.PGPLOT/PDL.Tut.PGPLOT.pod
>>
>> Converted to HTML:
>>
>> http://www.strw.leidenuniv.nl/~kenworthy/pdlpod/PDL.Tut.PGPLOT/PDL.Tut.PGPLOT.html
>>
>> ....and exported as PDF:
>>
>> http://www.strw.leidenuniv.nl/~kenworthy/pdlpod/PDL.Tut.PGPLOT/test.pdf
>>
>> So, what does this mean?
>>
>> Ideally, it would be good to see a PDL Book, a set of PDL Tutorials
>> and a PDL Reference (mostly made up of the PDL function documentation)
>> which factor in the hard work done on the earlier separate texts, so
>> that we can all point new users to a given help page from within PDL.
>>
>> The main work is doing the control code mangling, the conversion of
>> the images to PNG and checking that the new texts scan well. I can
>> take the lead on organisation, but I don't have that much time to do
>> conversions all by myself - if two or three people are willing to work
>> on converting a chapter at a time, we could pull something together
>> for a December/January release.
>>
>> Okay, have a look at the PDF if nothing else, and let me know what you think.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Matt

_______________________________________________
Perldl mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
_______________________________________________
Perldl mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl

Reply via email to