I can do something. At some point I may even do my own writing about PDL::PP, which sorely needs more documentation revisions. (There, I've ranted about #3. :-)
David On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Matthew Kenworthy <[email protected]> wrote: >> When I run podchecker on the PDL.Tut.PGPLOT.pod file, I >> get errors for the O<> constructs. Shouldn't/Couldn't they >> be placed in a =for PDF line so that things don't barf as >> a normal pod? It makes the podchecker program happy >> here.... does the output still generate correctly with this >> type of line? >> >> =for pdf O<PGPLOTFigs/ex_env1.8.png> > > You're quite right - I'd been running podchecker as part of the HTML > build process, but forgot to add it to the pod2pdf script. Adding the > =for gets rid of the offending statements. Thanks! > > Matt > > -- > Matthew Kenworthy / Assistant Professor / Leiden Observatory > Niels Bohrweg 2 (#463) / P.O. Box 9513 / 2300 RA Leiden / NL > > _______________________________________________ > Perldl mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl > -- Sent via my carrier pigeon. _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
