I'm willing and able to contribute where necessary and opportune. Regards, Dan
On 19/10/2011, at 5:06 AM, David Mertens wrote: > I can do something. At some point I may even do my own writing about > PDL::PP, which sorely needs more documentation revisions. (There, I've > ranted about #3. :-) > > David > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Matthew Kenworthy > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> When I run podchecker on the PDL.Tut.PGPLOT.pod file, I >>> get errors for the O<> constructs. Shouldn't/Couldn't they >>> be placed in a =for PDF line so that things don't barf as >>> a normal pod? It makes the podchecker program happy >>> here.... does the output still generate correctly with this >>> type of line? >>> >>> =for pdf O<PGPLOTFigs/ex_env1.8.png> >> >> You're quite right - I'd been running podchecker as part of the HTML >> build process, but forgot to add it to the pod2pdf script. Adding the >> =for gets rid of the offending statements. Thanks! >> >> Matt >> >> -- >> Matthew Kenworthy / Assistant Professor / Leiden Observatory >> Niels Bohrweg 2 (#463) / P.O. Box 9513 / 2300 RA Leiden / NL >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Perldl mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl >> > > > > -- > Sent via my carrier pigeon. > > _______________________________________________ > Perldl mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
