Hi,
below it is a copy of a comment I made after David Mertens commented on
one of my posts on Prima.
I would share my think on this, as it relates imo also to PDL.
It is a common issue that any toolkit as Prima or PDL, where no effort
was made by some publisher to make some publishable stuff, there are two
different kinds of actors:
- developers that already know all about the toolkit and are concerned
with internals and upfront problems.
- users that need to start, generally have only reference material, but
no path to navigate.
As it is natural for developers not needing what a user would need, the
effort to make a resource adoptable by users is a completely different task.
That is what a publisher numerous staff make is directing the writing of
a book, and where the value of the result is.
Meanwhile, I am just trying to writing something roughly going in this
second category.
Any comment to this is welcome.
--
Fabio D'Alfonso
'Enabling Business Through IT'
cell. +39.348.059.40.22 ***
web: www.fabiodalfonso.com <http://www.fabiodalfonso.com/>
email: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>linkedin:
www.linkedin.com/in/fabiodalfonso <http://it.linkedin.com/in/fabiodalfonso>
twitter: www.twitter.com/#!/fabio_dalfonso
<http://www.twitter.com/#%21/fabio_dalfonso>
fax: +39.06.874.599.581
BlackBerry® Wireless Enabled Address.
** Hidden numbers are automatically rejected by the phone*
_______________________________________________
Perldl mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
