Matthew Astley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm all for hacking the repository, if only we can.
Me too.
> <rhet>Is there an FAQ on messing with the repository?</rhet>
Haven't noticed one yet.
> Folks using proper cvs have Piers' modules file to reshape their world
> anyway.
Modules files?
> I think the api/ directory has some useful stuff in it about the way
> the API was inheritted from JUnit. This is probably worth refining,
> although Brians board comment was that it should be fairly concise.
> > Thirdly, ideally we would rename Test-Unit-0.1 to Test-Unit, or
> > maybe src (although src is already the name of the cvs module for
> > some reason).
>
> We already have the module
>
> Test-Unit src/Test-Unit-0.1
>
> which is why I suggested just adding a src/README or
> src/Test-Unit-0.1_is-active file to keep the cvsweb users quiet.
True.
> > The problem with this is that sourceforge doesn't allow us
> > access to our repository,
>
> Is this definite?
AFAIK. Feel free to check ...
> > Hence the need to do it ASAP, unless we could persuade sourceforge
> > to mangle the repository or something.
>
> If we can mangle directly, presumably we'd do
>
> mv src/Test-Unit-0.1 Test-Unit
> mv src historic
Something like that.
_______________________________________________
Perlunit-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perlunit-devel
