Christian Lemburg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> From: "Adam Spiers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I think we should do something about the confusing structure of the
> > cvs tree ASAP. It's been mentioned before IIRC, but I can't remember
> > if anything was decided.
> >
> > Firstly, does anyone have any objections to cvs
> > removing Test-Unit-0.06? (This won't stop anyone being able to
> > retrieve it if they really want, of course.)
>
> No, I'd say get rid of it. It's on the CPAN, too, if someone really wants
> it.
> (No real reason for that though.)
>
> > Secondly, it's unclear to newbies (including me ;-) what UnitTests/
> > and api/ are there for. Again, I vote we cvs remove, as this reduces
> > confusion while maintaining accessibility.
>
> They are still left from the very beginning of this project.
> I'd say remove them, too.
OK, that stuff is gone. What about tools/ and XUnit-0.01/?
> Renaming to Test-Unit is definitively the way to go. Test-Unit-0.1 is
> only there (with a version number, I mean) because of historical reasons.
Agreed. I'll get in touch with sourceforge to see if they can help.
_______________________________________________
Perlunit-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perlunit-devel
