Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Christian Lemburg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > From: "Adam Spiers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > I think we should do something about the confusing structure of the
> > > cvs tree ASAP. It's been mentioned before IIRC, but I can't remember
> > > if anything was decided.
> > >
> > > Firstly, does anyone have any objections to cvs
> > > removing Test-Unit-0.06? (This won't stop anyone being able to
> > > retrieve it if they really want, of course.)
> >
> > No, I'd say get rid of it. It's on the CPAN, too, if someone really wants
> > it.
> > (No real reason for that though.)
> >
> > > Secondly, it's unclear to newbies (including me ;-) what UnitTests/
> > > and api/ are there for. Again, I vote we cvs remove, as this reduces
> > > confusion while maintaining accessibility.
> >
> > They are still left from the very beginning of this project.
> > I'd say remove them, too.
>
> OK, that stuff is gone. What about tools/ and XUnit-0.01/?
>
> > Renaming to Test-Unit is definitively the way to go. Test-Unit-0.1 is
> > only there (with a version number, I mean) because of historical reasons.
>
> Agreed. I'll get in touch with sourceforge to see if they can help.
NB: If you do this, don't forget to get rid of the Test-Unit entry in
CVSROOT/modules
--
Piers
_______________________________________________
Perlunit-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perlunit-devel
