On 11/20/22 17:48, Bryn Llewellyn wrote:
hjp-pg...@hjp.at wrote:
ronljohnso...@gmail.com wrote:
[developers or devops folks] like to "fix" things without documenting what they
did, and then, when
something breaks, denying they did anything (or honestly not believing that
whatever "trivial" thing they did could any major or deliterious impact).
Which is why you want to automate deployments. When the easiest way to fix something in
production is to just push the change into the repo, this is what people will do. When
doing it the "proper" way is much more complicated than just fudging it, people
will do the latter.
Thanks to all who offered their views on my question. It seems that different
people will reach different conclusions. I’ll take this as permission to reach
my own conclusion.
Not sure why you think you need permission to take whatever action you
desire on a database whose only usage stipulation is that you maintain a
copy of the license.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
