Just a question... Are there any reasons not to just take the source and compile it under RHEL 3.0? Or am I missing something? (We are about to install 3.0, so I would really like to know..)
BTJ On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 16:08, Tom Lane wrote: > Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The RHEL3 beta (taroon) had rh-postgresql-server built and included. Does > > RHEL3 not include this package? > > I have not actually installed RHEL3 to check, but my understanding is > that it's not there. There was a last-minute decision taken to pull > PG and MySQL from the base distribution with the intent of packaging > them as a separate "layered product". Latest word is that that plan > is off again, leaving us (RH) with no open-source database support > and lots of egg on our faces. So yeah, I'm a bit annoyed. I suppose > some RHEL3 packages will emerge from the mess eventually, but I don't > know exactly how or when. > > I think it's important for the powers-that-be to realize that they are > not messing around with unimportant software that no one uses. Thus > my encouragement to people to send in complaints. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
