On Monday, April 13, 2026, Robert Treat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I don't have a strong opinion on it, but I think generally that clean > up patches (where we aren't fixing some kind of document mistake or > misleading information) generally just go into HEAD for the next > release, though if it easily applies cleanly to back branches and you > want to do it, it's probably ok to apply it backwards, but I wouldn't > spend any time on it if it didn't. >
I was under the impression that on both user-facing behavior changes grounds, and translation grounds, back-patching changes to existing messages is not allowed absent a true factual bug. David J.
