"David G. Johnston" <[email protected]> writes: > I was under the impression that on both user-facing behavior changes > grounds, and translation grounds, back-patching changes to existing > messages is not allowed absent a true factual bug.
"Not allowed" is a bit strong, but yeah we don't usually mess with
translatable strings in back branches without a pretty good reason.
The translators have enough work as it is.
regards, tom lane
