Hi Kawata-san, On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 08:34:12PM +0900, Tatsuya Kawata wrote: > Hi Bertrand-san, > > Thanks for the review. > > > Should we add a description of the consequences of not being able to > > acquire the lock in fast-path (when there are no available slots)? > > For example, we could say that this is considerably more expensive > > and may be subject to contention. > > Agreed. v3 adds the following paragraph at the end of the Fast-Path
Thanks! Looking closer, I'm not sure that in: - lock table + lock table. See <xref linkend="locking-tables-fast-path"/> for + details. the "for details" is needed. Looking at the pg_locks table, it looks like "(See xxxx)" would be more consistent. Regards, -- Bertrand Drouvot PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
