On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 04:07:39AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: > Looking closer, I'm not sure that in: > > - lock table > + lock table. See <xref linkend="locking-tables-fast-path"/> for > + details. > > the "for details" is needed. Looking at the pg_locks table, it looks like > "(See xxxx)" would be more consistent.
Hmm. system-views.sgml has a large paragraph about fast-path locks, and seems to be the only location in the official docs where the term is used. I am wondering if the paragraph in view-pg-locks could be improved and/or shortened with what you are proposing here, even if most of it points to the inconsistencies one could get when querying pg_locks due to the volatile nature of fast-path locks... At least a link on the pg_locks page pointing to this new section could be something to consider. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
