Hi Bertrand-san, Michael-san, Thanks for the additional review!
> Looking closer, I'm not sure that in: > > - lock table > + lock table. See <xref linkend="locking-tables-fast-path"/> for > + details. > > the "for details" is needed. Looking at the pg_locks table, it looks like > "(See xxxx)" would be more consistent. Fixed. > I am wondering if the paragraph in view-pg-locks could be > improved and/or shortened with what you are proposing here, even if > most of it points to the inconsistencies one could get when querying > pg_locks due to the volatile nature of fast-path locks... At least a > link on the pg_locks page pointing to this new section could be > something to consider. Thanks for the detailed thought. I looked at that paragraph. I was hoping to fold the two together, but the content did not seem to overlap, so I limited the change to adding a link as you suggested. v4 attached. Regards, Tatsuya Kawata
v4-0001-doc-add-Fast-Path-Locking-section.patch
Description: Binary data
