On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > How about adding an optional test a la "bigtest" for GiST for this > > release? > > We could do that, but it seems like rather pointless effort, compared > to just telling people "go run the tests in these contrib modules if > you want to test GIST". > > I have no objection to fully integrating some GIST test(s) for 7.2. > I just don't want to deal with it at this late stage of the 7.1 cycle. > We have a long list of considerably more mainstream to-do items yet > to deal with ... Not up to us to deal with, its up to Oleg ... Oleg, if you could work on and submit patches for this before the release, that would be appreciated ... it might also serve to increase visibility of GiST if ppl know there is a regress test for it ...
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Lamar Owen
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Lamar Owen
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! The Hermit Hacker
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Hannu Krosing
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! The Hermit Hacker
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 ... selkovjr
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for... selkovjr
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for... selkovjr
- [HACKERS] Getting configure to not... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Getting configure to... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Getting configur... Patrick Welche