Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > cvs annotate is a really, really handy tool, unfortunetly these > indent runs remove this very useful tool as well as do a major job > of obfuscating the code changes. I think this is a good reason for *not* applying pgindent on an incremental basis, but only once per release cycle. That at least lets cvs annotate be useful within a cycle. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian